Document information

Physical location:

RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1858-70, f. 260-1. 67.03.26a

Plant names

Preferred Citation:

Ferdinand von Mueller to George Bentham, 1867-03-26 [67.03.26a]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/67-03-26a>, accessed June 20, 2025

26/3/67
This month, dear Mr Bentham, I have not much to report. Unfortunately I got the rest of the
Goodeniaceae

Search for Goodeniaceae in

not ready for the Yorkshire, as many departmental duties stormed on me, but I shall send them off by the Wellesley in a few days.
Goodeniaceae

Search for Goodeniaceae in

comprise more than 20 fascicles! besides the 5 already forwarded with 3 of Lobeliaceae by the Great Britain.
1
Great Britain sailed on 25 January 1867 with collections of several
Goodeniaceae

Search for Goodeniaceae in

genera (RB MSS M44, M notebook recording despatch of plants for Bentham for Flora qustraliensis, Library, RBG Melbourne).
You will find them well arranged & I have elaborated most of the new species,
2
M typically published new species before sending the specimens to Bentham; see Lucas (2003).
so that you will be able to work with great facility. This year I shall be freer of work & thus will send you all the
Monopetaleae

Search for Monopetaleae in

in good order prepared. I have Leichhardts & Drummonds already inserted. Drummonds collection of
Thalamiflorae

Search for Thalamiflorae in

has many numbers not quoted by you.
3
M received James Drummond's herbarium of his WA collections from Drummond's son early in 1866; see M to G. Bentham, 5 February 1866. When using Drummond as authority for distribution data in Flora australiensis, Bentham quoted Drummond's specimen numbers, e.g., 'Drummond 4th coll. n. 158, 5th coll. n. 96', Bentham (1863-78), vol. 2, p. 192, under Psoralea eriantha.
You have one advantage, it is this, you receive all plants for elaboration together, while I had to work successively on bits of material, just as it accumulated from year to year.
Have you compared the leaves of
Sterculia foetida

Search for Sterculia foetida in

in RBr herbarium from N Australia with those of Adansonia Gr[egorii?]
4
editorial addition — Text obscured by binding.
Is it really the St. foetida?
5
Bentham (1863-78), vol. 1, pp. 226-7, although describing
Sterculia foetida

Search for Sterculia foetida in

from Indian specimens, included it as an Australian species 'on Brown's authority' without having seen it in the collection of Robert Brown (1773-1858) — which if it existed would have been at the British Museum, where M sought it in M to W. Carruthers, 19 January 1887. 'Brown's authority' may have been the mention of its occurrence in New Holland (Horsfield, Bennet & Brown (1838-52), p. 227). If Bentham had access to Brown's unpublished MSS, he may have seen the list of plants observed at 'Prince of Wales Islands, Island e' [Goods Island, Qld], in November 1802 which included 'Sterculia foetida? fol: tantum visa' [leaves barely seen], transcribed in R. Brown (2001), p. 298; see also Bean (2004).
I have sent a collector to Arnhems land with Capt Cadell, as he will touch on parts of the coast seen neither by me nor by Cunningham.
6
As part of a plan to provide land for settlement in NT, the SA government sent a number of survey parties to the north coast. Many had difficulties or were only partly effective, including Captain Cadell who was sent with a party of seven in 1867. See Threadgill (1922), ch. IV and pp. 105 ff. for Cadell. The collector was Benjamin John Gulliver, not Thomas A. Gulliver as stated by Desmond (1994).
In the spring I trust to take a little recreation trip, having been now a prisoner to the house or rather office for more than 5 years without any intermission. I think of going then to King's Island to make a full phytographic survey of it & thus to connect still more our continental with the Tasmanian flora.
Some of RBr.
Goodeniaceae

Search for Goodeniaceae in

I have not been able to recognize.
I am trying all I can to induce amateur collectors to come forward, that the range of the species may be fully determined. I have asked Dr Milligan to send a set of his plants to Kew & to Melbourne
7
Milligan, in response to a letter received from M, offered herbarium specimens collected in Tasmania and the Bass Straight islands to Kew, and asked Hooker for suggestions of other museums where the material would be of use and well cared for. Milligan later asked to retrieve, for re-deposit at the Royal Society of Tasmania, some of the Tasmanian specimens he had left at Kew in 1868, as well as providing a case of specimens for Hooker to give to Asa Gray during Gray's visit to Kew from September 1868 (J. Milligan to J. Hooker, 29 August 1867; J. Milligan to J. Hooker, 8 July 1868 (RBG Kew archives, Directors' letters vol 95, English letters 1840-1900, MED-MOO, letter nos. 128, 129).
& hope you will give Dampier's plants some day a few hours inspection. They would form a good material for a small memoir in the L.S. transact.
8
No specific article by Bentham on Dampier's plants has been identified.
Ever your attached
Ferd Mueller.
I shall hasten the
Epacrideae

Search for Epacrideae in

off. I trust you have [...]
9
illegible — Four or five words obscured by binding
the
Compositae

Search for Compositae in

for genera plantarum.
10
Bentham & Hooker (1862-83).