The correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller: 25, WILTON PLACE, S.W. ¶ July 23/65 ¶ My dear Sir ¶ ¶ I write a few lines to say that being in town for a day or two (my vacation time has commenced) I find your letter of the 21st April and at the s...

Document information

Physical location:

RB MSS M4, Library, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne. 65.07.23

Plant names

Affonsea
Search for Affonsea in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Baeckea
Search for Baeckea in
Chamaelaucieae
Search for Chamaelaucieae in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Columbia
Search for Columbia in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Compositae
Search for Compositae in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Cunonia
Search for Cunonia in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Eucalyptus
Search for Eucalyptus in
Geissois Benthamiana
Search for Geissois Benthamiana in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Gillbeea
Search for Gillbeea in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Irvingia
Search for Irvingia in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Macintyria
Search for Macintyria in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Myrtaceae
Search for Myrtaceae in
Pithecolobium Vaillantii
Search for Pithecolobium Vaillantii in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Polygala
Search for Polygala in
Tiliaceae
Search for Tiliaceae in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Umbelliferae
Search for Umbelliferae in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Weinmannia Biagiana
Search for Weinmannia Biagiana in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index
Xanthophyllum flavescens
Search for Xanthophyllum flavescens in
- This website
- Australian Plant Name Index

Preferred Citation:

George Bentham to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1865-07-23. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/65-07-23>, accessed April 19, 2025

Pencilled note at the head of the letter in M's hand: 'M'Kinlay — E[uge]n | Symplocos | n. g. Celastrin'. See also M to G. Bentham, 22 September 1865.

25, WILTON PLACE, S.W.

July 23/65

My dear Sir

I write a few lines to say that being in town for a day or two (my vacation time has commenced) I find your letter of the 21st April and at the same time yours of the 25th August 1864 which came with it to Sir W. Hooker's three days since.

Mr Woolls I know has been proposed at the Linnean Society but I forget whether the election has taken place or whether is is to be at the next meeting.

See M to G. Bentham 21 April 1865.

At any rate he either has had or will have the usual formal notice of it.

The specimens you sent by the mail have also arrived — I shall look over and examine the when I finally revise my MSS — as I have already written out all but .

Of those belonging to the last vols. is a Xanthophyllum not distinguishable from the common Indian X. flavescens unless it be by the albumen. But recent researches have shown that the presence or absence of albumen varies in different closely allied species in this genus as in the thick-seeded s

is a very remarkable plant being strictly a congener of the Brazilian s of which it has the habit, simply pinnate leaves, flowers and plurality of pistels You will find three species described and one figured in Hook. Lond Journ. vol 5

appears to me to be a new and distinct genus of although in many respects allied to I find 4 to 6 ovules in each cell of the ovary the leaves in the specimen you sent are simple though they at first sight appear pinnate

The name is preoccupied by a genus of Hookers in Simarubeae Trans Linn Soc XXIII. 167 and Gen. [Pl.] 314

M had erected (I. australiana) in B65.04.01, pp. 17–18, but the genus had been erected in J. Hooker (1862), p. 167, in the part issued by 1861 (Gage & Stearn (1988), p,. 212). See also Bentham & Hooker (1862-83), vol. 1, p. 314.

I have not had time to examine but from your character I cannot agree with you in putting it into Weinmannia and surely you cannot have examined the flowers and fruits of a true Geissois if you stil consider that this genus ought to be united to Weinmannia. To me Weinmannia as limited by Hooker and adopted from him in my Flora appears to me a genus constant in habit and character in America Africa Asia Australia and New Zealand, and readily distinguished from all others except .

I am glad to hear you are sending . (supposing to contain as you estimate 100 species) will include only about 570 species and I should think that and other small Calyciflorous families can scarcely exceed 200 which would leave room in the volume for at least 600

Many thanks about the money you promise for the 3d vol., but there is no hurry. It will take me at least the whole winter to finish it, for although I anticipate nothing near so tedious as the s etc., still I have yet before me. I cannot indeed undertake the elaborate details of this genus which you propose, that cannot be done upon dried specimens alone (which in this genus are necessarily so very imperfect) all I can do is to identify as much as possible old published species and give such an enumeration as I can compile.

See M to G. Bentham, 21 April 1865.

I had been in hopes that you would have monographised the genus before I came to it and now I must leave it to you to prepare a complete monograph with proper illustrations which can only be properly done in the country with your means and talents and which you might make a lasting monument to your memory

Yours very sincerely

George Bentham

Even if this 3d vol. takes me two years I am engaged to the public that it shall make up for the deficiency of the last and contain at least 1400 species

You will have heard from Kew of the despatch of the two boxes of etc.

I see you mention (Fragm V, 16) a . Pray do not publish any such. I forbore giving a specific name to what I presumed to be an Australian Geissois because it is doubtful, the spike of capsules and the leaves may belong to totally different plants and it is an unwarrantable infliction on science to publish species which cannot be recognised. If the plant I alluded to be a true Geissois then let it receive a proper specific name and you know I have a horror of all Benthamianas and other botanical compliments.