Document information
Physical location:
RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1858-70, f. 166. 65.06.11Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to George Bentham, 1865-06-11. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/65-06-11>, accessed April 19, 2025
1
The letter has the printed and embossed letterhead: Ladies' Leichardt [i.e. Leichhardt] Search Committee'. Bentham has annotated the letter: Dichostachys = Antirhea | Woollsia
= Lasianthus very near L [obscurus] | Mephitidia
There is another annotation below Bentham's, apparently added later: […] . arrived.
The illegible part appears to be an abbreviation.
Dear Mr Bentham.
The two Rubiaceae sent to you by this mail are evidently as genera new to Australia
and possibly new to science. I have not carefully examined them and also not described
them, in as much as you have much better material to judge about their position than
I have & therefore will be best able to pass an opinion them when you enumerate the
Australian. The ripe fruit of both genera is as yet unknown. I have this day sent
off to Kew box No. 26 bringing supplemental collections for your use while writing the
3 vol. of the Australian Flora.
The box is sent by the Sussex and the freight as on all former occasions paid. I should
feel obliged by your giving instructions that the freight is paid in London when the
collections come back, for the last 5 or 6 boxes have in freight been charged to me
both
ways!
2
Bentham (1863-78).
The draft of £100 for vol. 3 goes by this mail, as I have learnt from the Minister
of finance.
3
The beginning of this sentence is marked in the margin with a cross. See G. Bentham
to M, 21 September 1865.
I write more fully to Sir Will. Hooker
4
Regardfully
yr
Ferd Mueller
Rubiaceae