Document information
Physical location:
Natural History Museum, London, General Library, MSS OC 62 (Owen correspondence), vol. XIX, ff. 370-3, 401. 64.09.25Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Richard Owen, 1864-09-25. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/64-09-25>, accessed September 11, 2025
Melbourne botanic Garden,
25. Sept. 1864.
My dear Professor.
It affords me great pleasure to inform you, that I have despatched to you under care
of the obliging Commander of the "Great Britain" a cag
with a female Echidna Hystrix and a small glass containing the minute young of the
same. I received both detached, but the finder of the animals saw the young attached
to the mamma of the mother, as you will observe in the letter-extract herewith transmitted.
Letter 1
Fearing that an accident might befal this sending on its way to you, I thought it
prudent to institute a rough examination of the mother, before the creature was despatched,
and in this examination was undertaken jointly
by Dr J Rudall, one of the most eminent medical men of this City and myself. We do
not presume thereby for a moment to anticipate any of your own observations, but since
it is so excessively difficult to obtain these Monotremes in a state of pregnancy
or with the young in its early state of nuturation, Dr Rudall & myself thought it
best to convey what we can whilst examining (though amidst other duties hurriedly)
the creatures to paper, and superficial as our inspection was we venture to submit
the results to you.
After
we had despatched the specimina we were rather startled by an account in one of the
country-papers (herewith enclosed)
according to which an Ornithorrhyncus had laid two shell-less eggs in captivity Dr
Rudall & myself certainly arrived at the conclusion, that the Monotremata could not
be oviparous and believe, that some error must have given rise to the paragraph in
question. I then wrote to a Gentleman on the Murray-River, Mr Peter Beveridge, J.P.,
whose sheep station is frequented by the remnants of the native-tribes of the Murray,
and who has great influence over them, to elicit any information obtainable on the
process of generation of the Platypus from the aborigines, the Echidna not occuring
in the low-lands. My friend with his usual zeal & intelligence responded to the call
and the byefollowing letter of his will convey to you the results of his enquiry.
Letter 2
There is not the slightest doubt of Mr Beveridge having most correctly understood
what the natives stated on the subject, he being so conversant with their language,
nor do I think that these keen observers could have been under some misconception
themselfes, as all that pertains of animal life has to them so prominent interest
& is watched by them so closely; nor do I see any reason of the natives having purposely
stated anything to mislead us on the subject, a bright point on their character being
veracity. You will observe, that the account received from the Murray-natives bears
out Dr Rudalls and my anticipation and is in absolute contradiction to the statement
promulgated about the Platypus by the Gentleman at Wood's Point. I wrote to the latter
for being favored with further particulars about his observations of the Ornithorrhynchus
kept by him in captivity, not merely to see how far his statements about the propagation
of these animals could be reconciled with the information derived from the blacks,
but also to learn how he managed to keep his Ornithorryhynchus so long alife, I having
in all my efforts failed to maintain them longer than 4 or 5 weeks in captivity. But
up to date I have received no answer.
As it appeared to me of importance to obtain from the various native tribes, before
these unfortunate people fade from the globe, all the knowledge they have of the subject
under discussion, I adressed several influential residents in districts where the
natives are still living, asking to make the necessary or desired interrogation. The
results of these shall be gladly communicated to you. It may be also possible to obtain
sooner or later animals in a state, that will set the long discussed question at rest,
but since all my endevours hitherto failed except in the instance, which secured the
specimen now on the way to you and which is not affording conclusive evidence, I believe
it will be best to gather all
reliable
testimony & weigh the total of its value in any subsequent conclusions.
1
keg?
2
Letter 1 is written in the margin with the intended position indicated by asterisk; see G. Harris to M, 31 August 1864.
3
Changes were made by M to this part of the sentence. Before the changes it read '...
and in this examination I was aided by Dr Rudall, ...'.
4
See account of dissection of the female and sketch of the young in M and J. Rudall
to R. Owen, 25 August 1864, published in Owen (1865); and also their description of
a dissection of a male, which accompanied either this letter or M to R. Owen, 25 August
1864 (in this edition as 64-08-25c).
5
A newspaper clipping, quoting 'The Mountaineer of the 29th' and describing the capture
of a Platypus which laid two white, soft shell-less eggs while in the possession of
Mr Rumley, gold receiver of Woods Point, is attached to an undated note in M's hand.
The note, bound as f. 401, is given as a postscript to this letter.
6
Letter not found.
7
Letter 2 is written in the margin with the intended position indicated by asterisk; see P. Beveridge to M, 8 September 1864.
8
Letter not found.
9
An answer was later received and transmitted to Owen, and published by him in Owen
(1865); see G. Rumley to M, 25 September 1864 (in this edition as 64-09-25a).
It occurs to me, that I could afford you for your brilliant researches perhaps some
additional material from here, perhaps the Phascolarctos cinereus
& other animals, which hitherto have not reached Europe alife and which it is hopeless
to endeavour sending. The Phascolarctos solely living on the fresh and chiefly young
leaves of various species of Eucalyptus in a natural state, can I believe not readily
be accustomed to other food & hence the apparently unsurmountable difficulty arises
to send them out of an Eucalyptus country. At least all
my
trials with the young failed, but I will once more endeavour to accustom them to
farinaceous food mixed with the powder of dried Eucalyptus leaves & should this prove
successful I will forward the creatures to England. But I could most easily send you
specimens in Alcohol, and perhaps, if you deem them desirable for the British Museum,
you would be so friendly, to cause a caske of spirits mixed with some oil of turpentine
to be sent for the purpose of preserving such animals. If Alcohol thus mixed was sent
out of the Bond it would pay here but a trifling duty compared to the expenses, which
the purchase of such an article in quantity here involves. If you will kindly point
out any other animals desirable from here, they could be sent simultaneously.
10
Koala; M misspelled the generic name, which is Phascolarctus. This may have been deliberate, to make the ending consistent with the Greek root
of the name. See for an argued case concerning terminology, M to G. Bentham, 5 February 1866, on the use of 'Flora Australiensis'
.
The "Great Britain" left Port Phillip at the end of last month. So probably she will
be in Liverpool before this letter reaches you. Under any circumstances pray arrange
that some trustworthy person receives the consignment from Capt Gray, who most kindly
took the things into his private Cabin. The Captain will leave the Ship almost immediately
after arrival.
In regard to the Meteorite affair, which has by the feelings of right evinced by the
Ministers of the Crown assumed a satisfactory aspect I have written by last mail.
Accept, dear Professor Owen, the assurance of my most profound admiration & allow
me to remain your deeply attached
Ferd. Mueller.
12
The following text is an undated note in M’s hand, bound in the sequence of letters
received by Owen as f. 401. It is treated as an enclosure to this letter because the
newspaper cutting referred to in the letter is pasted on to it. The newspaper that was the source of the clipping has not been identified, but a
number of newspaper articles reprinting the same text were published in early September
1864, for example Mount Alexander mail, 1 September 1864, p. 2.