Document information

Physical location:

RB MSS M4, Library, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne. 63.11.19a

Plant names

Preferred Citation:

George Bentham to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1863-11-19 [63.11.19a]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/63-11-19a>, accessed July 27, 2025

25, WILTON PLACE, S.W.
Nov 19/63
My dear Sir
Since I wrote last month I have received yours of the 14th Augt
1
See M to G. Bentham, 11 August 1863, to which a PS dated 14 August 1863 is added. Bentham's response addresses topics considered in each part of M's letter.
Many thanks for the trouble you have taken about the £100 for the 2d vol. the Agent here Mr Sargeant
2
i.e. W. C. Sergeaunt, Colonial Agent General, through whose office such payments were transmitted.
had not received any instructions about it by the last mail but no doubt will by the present mail the bulk of which will arrive in a few days.
The " " you sent
3
Kew specimen K000642422 has M's label ' FM, Bremer Bay' and, in what appears to be Bentham's hand, ' Turcz'.
is Turcz which on account of the 2-celled (spuriously of course) pod must be retained in Mirbelia.
I certainly keep up Dillwynia — but the absence of stipules is only a general not an absolute character there are 2 or 3 Pultenaeas without and a Dillwynia with stipules
I had reduced to P. Truxillensis in the Brasilian Leguminosae — I have not yet come to it in the Australian Flora
I have not got on so fast as usual this month as I have had to work up a large number of non Australian genera for Gen. Pl.
4
Bentham & Hooker (1862-83).
but I have done the Australian and and am now at Tephrosia — the tropical shrubby s and Tephrosias are very difficulty to make out from the very incomplete specimens — there are many Tephrosias very distinct in stamenal tube style seed etc but many of which I have not both flower and fruit good and I am really puzzled three or four differ from the genus in the venation of the leaves and the foliage is so apt to deceive without examination that I found in your covers of T. flammea two distinct Tephrosias a and a which at first sight looked all the same — I observe you have never worked up the genus a very difficult one.
cannot in my opinion be referred to
5
See B62.07.01, p. 45; 65.02.06, t. 26.
— the anthers are quite different, there are always 2 ovules and sometimes 2 seeds and the seed does not adhere to the pericarp — besides the pinnate leaves which is exceptional only in 2 or 3 Cape species — but I see no one character to keep out of of which it has precisely the flowers [axillary] fruit and habit.
I will look into again when I go over the genus with your specimens
cannot I think go into Mirbelia as from the remains of the stamens in our specimens they are monodelphous or diadelphous — the genus must remain uncertain till we have complete specimens
A case of Acaciæ is just arrived and unpacked yesterday — with 2 parcels for Seemann which have been forwarded and one for I forget who — I had just time to see that the parcels were in good condition — a few specimens of the previous boxes had again grubs in them when unpacked but to no great extent.
As soon as your and are all come I shall begin revising and returning a case or two at a time
Yours ever sincerely
George Bentham
Could not you send us any paper for the Linnean Society? Any of your observations on the comparative vegetation of the different descriptions of country in Australia the forest land the scrub the sandy desert etc would be very valuable
6
M published no paper with the Linnean Society of London after B59.02.02.