Document information

Physical location:

RB MSS M4, Library, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne. 63.02.12a

Plant names

Preferred Citation:

George Bentham to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1863-02-12 [63.02.12a]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/63-02-12a>, accessed April 19, 2025

London Febr 12 /63
25 Wilton Place S W
My dear Sir
Enclosed is the bill of lading of the two boxes sent off whilst I was at Paris, I understand the copies of our Genera
1
Bentham & Hooker (1862-83), vol. 1, part 1.
were forgotten to be put in but they will go in the next box which I shall soon send off.
At Paris I verified a number of doubtful plants published by DC
2
Augustin de Candolle.
and others
Hemistemma Leschenaultii

Search for Hemistemma Leschenaultii in

is a
Beyeria

Search for Beyeria in

Iberis linearifolia

Search for Iberis linearifolia in

(
Lepia linifolia

Search for Lepia linifolia in

Desv.) is the Murchison River Lepidium which I had described as new under the name of bicorne for which of course I substitute the name L. linifolium —
Sinapis hastata

Search for Sinapis hastata in

Desf is a garden mistake
3
See Bentham (1863-78), vol. 1, p. 65: the plant was described from one grown in the Jardin des Plantes from seed supposedly from Australia.
it is not Australian but the Spanish
Diplotaxis virgata

Search for Diplotaxis virgata in

— I made also many other verifications which you will see in the Flora.
I have been revising for press my MS which is now in the printer's hands or quite ready for him to the end of
Rutaceae

Search for Rutaceae in

— I had done
Malvaceae

Search for Malvaceae in

before yours arrived and have gone through them again with your specimens — Your
Hibiscus Beckleri

Search for Hibiscus Beckleri in

4
H. Becklerii?
is H. diversifolius Jacq and H. solanifolius is the true H. Pinonianus Gaud. — I do not find in your herbarium your own specimens of H. Elliottii but from those you sent previously to Sir Wm Hooker I had ascertained it to be H Drummondi
5
H. Drummondii?
Turcz. I have again bestowed much time on Sida
Abutilon

Search for Abutilon in

and Hibiscus the species of the latter are tolerably satisfactorily settled but for the others especially
Abutilon

Search for Abutilon in

the specimens are often too incomplete. It is almost impossible to settle the species without good series in fruit as well as in flower. I have done my best but there will be much to modify hereafter: S. geranioides DC is a W. coast
Abutilon

Search for Abutilon in

of which neither you nor we had any specimens and remarkable for its deeply cut leaves.
I have made arrangements with the printer to get through three sheets a week so that the whole volume will I hope be ready early in June. I have also settled with him to have an extra copy in clean proof as printed off to send to you by the monthly mails I have today the first proof of the first sheet but none will be printed off time enough to send by this mail — next mail I hope to send you several.
I have done
Simarubeae

Search for Simarubeae in

. I was much interested by the fruiting specimens of your
Ailantus punctatus

Search for Ailantus punctatus in

6
A. punctata?
which is
Pentaceras australis

Search for Pentaceras australis in

Hook f. — for notwithstanding the resemblance in outward form to Ailantus the structure is quite different — not only the dotted leaves flower & inflorescence but the fruit itself — opening a young one you will see quite plainly the 2 ovules thus
whilst in Ailantus there is but one thus
and in the ripe fruit Pentaceras though indehiscent has the distinct cartilaginous endocarp of its allies among Zanthoxyleae which Ailantus has not. — Your
Ailantus imberbiflora

Search for Ailantus imberbiflora in

is indeed as you suggest very close to A. malabarica. I have kept it distinct however as having smaller flowers and more glabrous panicles — until better specimens shall be had. A. rhodoptera is precisely the common A. glandulosa much planted in many parts of the world and now made so much of for silk worms. I have carefully reexamined
Cadellia

Search for Cadellia in

— the additional pair of ovules which both Hooker & myself saw in 2 fl. we formerly dissected were we now think monstrous productions probably from some insect puncture — the flowers we have now opened have 2 only — and in every point the structure of
Cadellia

Search for Cadellia in

and
Suriana

Search for Suriana in

is so very much alike that the two might have been generically combined were it not for the different aspect the only real character to be relied on is that in
Cadellia

Search for Cadellia in

the styles are adnate and the ovule attached higher up so that the ovules and seeds are more pendulous than ascending.
The missing mails pr Colombo arrived at last considerably damaged by seawater but legible
7
See G. Bentham to M, 22 December 1862. The mail packet Colombo was wrecked on Minicoy Island, the southernmost island of the Lakshadweep archipelago, Indian Ocean, on 19 November 1862. Salvaged mail was delivered in three tranches, the last of which was due to arrive in London on 18 January 1863 (The Times, 27 December 1862, p. 7).
Many thanks for your communications including notes on our Genera which we duly note for consideration
8
See M to G. Bentham, 23 October 1862.
You mention having sent your account of Gregorys plants to the Edinburgh Society for publication.
9
See M to G. Bentham, 26 November 1862; M's account was published as B63.13.03.
I am sorry for this The consequence will be they will appear perhaps a twelvemonth hence and at any rate long after the publication of my first volume which I think scarcely fair — It appears to me that whilst I am publishing this Flora professedly with your assistance all new plants you have to publish should either be inserted in your Fragmenta or other works you publish yourself and of which you send to Sir W Hooker early copies that I can make use of — or the specimens sent to me to publish if you prefer it as I always make a point of retaining your names when not preoccupied. It is only by following one of these courses that you prevent useless additions to an already overloaded synonymy.
I see by the enclosed bill of lading that the freight is charged on — Dr Hooker tells me that he wrote to you that the Kew Establishment would pay the freight of these boxes one way (you kindly offered to pay both here and back) If by any mistake you have to pay both ways pray let me know and I will account to you for the half.
The fragments you sent by the October mail were still further injured by the wreck of the Colombo — I have however inserted the
Tinospora

Search for Tinospora in

as there was sufficient evidence to show that it must belong to that genus.
I have noted for future use the various remarks in your last.
As to Busbeckea it was only on going carefully through the whole genus
Capparis

Search for Capparis in

that both Dr Hooker and myself came to the conclusion that it could only be maintained as a section for the great differences in the calyx do not at all go with habit — and there is more affinity between the thick strictly valvate outer sepals of some American species and the conferruminate outer sepals of Busbeckia than between some other forms of calyx in the genus which no one thinks of separating — I consider one of the Australian species (your arborea I think but I have not my MS by me at this moment) as identical with the Norfolk Island one — at least I can detect no difference on comparing the specimens
Two botanists must always look at the limits of genera and species in different lights I therefore do not make you responsible for any thing I give as my own — Where I differ in opinion from you I state both opinions — adopting yours where I have much doubt as to my own, adhering to mine when I am more convinced I am right — but always it will be for future botanists to decide for one or the other. I have had too much experience to feel perfect confidence even where I have had the fullest conviction at the time.
Next mail you will receive I hope several sheets of the work. I have already had first proofs of three
Yours very sincerely
George Bentham
Feby 16 /63