Document information

Physical location:

RB MSS M4, Library, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne. 62.10.26

Plant names

Preferred Citation:

George Bentham to Ferdinand von Mueller, 1862-10-26. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/62-10-26>, accessed September 11, 2025

London
Oct 26/62
My dear Sir,
Since I wrote by the ordinary mail
1
G. Bentham to M, 8 October 1862.
I have received yours of the 26 Augt
2
M to G. Bentham, 26 August 1862 (in this edition as 62-08-26a).
— Your uneasiness about the boxes pr Dover Castle will have been long since removed — but when once a vessel has arrived in London there is no further occasion for anxiety — boxes do not get lost in London but it often takes some time before they are cleared — Agents have always a good deal to do and probably Dr Thomson on arriving had other things to attend to. The Roxburgh Castle is not yet arrived.
The boxes per Kent duly reached Kew and I am at work at
Sterculiaceae

Search for Sterculiaceae in

which I have nearly finished — Examining carefully every species makes modifications necessary in generic characters I had a little misunderstood
Hannafordia

Search for Hannafordia in

the specimens we had (Drummonds with a fragment of yours) were in fruit with very bad flowers in which I found very few staminodia and thought the petals much flatter than they prove to be. The plant is intermediate between
Buettneria

Search for Buettneria in

and
Lasiopetalum

Search for Lasiopetalum in

but still nearer the latter.
I still think that Guichenotia must include Sarotes and makes a natural genus of 5 sp. G. ledifolia, G. macrantha, G. semihastata (Sarotes F. Muell
Ditomostrophe

Search for Ditomostrophe in

Turcz) G. sarotes (S. ledifolia Lindl.) and G. micrantha (
Sarotes micrantha

Search for Sarotes micrantha in

Steetz
Thomasia pogonanthera

Search for Thomasia pogonanthera in

F. Muell.)
3
No letter from M arguing for the distinction between Guichenotia and Sarotes has been found, but M had retained Sarotes and Thomasia in B60.02.02, pp. 4-11.
I find we had specimens of your
Lysiosepalum

Search for Lysiosepalum in

— with larger flowers than yours but the same species It is
Thomasia involucrata

Search for Thomasia involucrata in

Turcz but I adopt your genus name.
I still think that Seringia must be restricted to S. platyphylla Gay, so different in habit and calyx from the others — perhaps S. lanceolata may be included but our specimens (Cunninghams) are not good — I shall see Brown's
4
Allan Cunningham's specimens were at Kew; The Australian collections of Robert Brown (1773-1858) were at the British Museum.
I found in your cover of
Rulingia pannosa

Search for Rulingia pannosa in

a sheet with 2 specimens of Leichhardts of quite a new Commersonia. The New England plant which you had thought
Rulingia cristifolia

Search for Rulingia cristifolia in

is not that sp. but R. rugosa Steetz of which I have only seen these and Cunninghams specimens. The fruit is quite different from that of R. pannosa.
R. cistifolia (a blunder for R. cristifolia Cunn.) is the common narrow leaved hermanniaefolia.
Your Melbourne Bot Gard specimens marked R. parviflora W. Austr are not R. parviflora Endl. They are exactly like luxuriant specimens of R. hermanniaefolia from N.S. Wales (the common form is R. oblongifolia Steetz) Is there not some mistake as to their origin? R. parviflora Endl. is not in your collection
The Pterospermum in your collection marked Illawara? Vernon
5
i.e. collected by William Vernon; see Bentham (1863-78), vol. 1, p. 233).
is an interesting addition. The specimen is insufficient absolutely to determine the species but I have little doubt but that it is P. acerifolium and if it be really extra tropical it is a remarkable station for it.
The
Calophyllum

Search for Calophyllum in

from Leichhardt in your collection adds a new Order to the Flora. I had as yet no
Guttifera

Search for Guttifera in

and have not now any
Ternstroemiacea

Search for Ternstroemiacea in

.
The Urena is an addition I had expected it is U. lobata I have similar long involucred varieties from various places
Your
Emmenospermum

Search for Emmenospermum in

is a plant we had very good flowering specimens of but no fruit. Dr Hooker who did the
Rhamneae

Search for Rhamneae in

generally could not find anything to distinguish it from
Alphitonia

Search for Alphitonia in

I will examine again when I come to it
6
Bentham & Hooker (1862-83), vol. 1, p. 381; however,
Emmenospermum

Search for Emmenospermum in

was included as a genus in the 'Addenda et Corrigenda' to the volume, p. 999; see also Bentham (1863-78), vol. 1, pp. 414-5.
Your
Cryptandra longistaminea

Search for Cryptandra longistaminea in

was in a collection we received in spring gathered in New England I believe by the man Stuart who supplied you
With regard to the limits of species I quite agree with you in the necessity of reducing the large number of bad species published of Australian plants — but as to fixing definitively the limits of any one I think it hopeless — I have studied species living — wild & in cultivation — and dry since 1819, for the first two or three years I was always detecting new species à la Jordan
7
Alexis Jordan was notorious for his extremely narrow species concept.
then observing the same species in a living state at differences of latitude of about 15 degrees first opened my eyes as to the variability of species the next 30 years gradually convinced me of the possibility of fixing definitive limits if taken comprehensive enough — but the last eight or ten years have very much shaken these convictions and the great number of facts brought to light by the Darwinian controversy necessitate the reconsideration of a great many points which I had thought settled. We must therefore be particularly cautious in uniting as species forms which have that degree of apparent permanency which will justify the majority of botanists in maintaining them distinct.
I will carefully examine the
Hymenanthera

Search for Hymenanthera in

question again — I thought I saw other characters besides the prevalent foliage — but if one passes into the other in cultivation it is a question of luxuriance and not even of variety. I will look again and adopt you views unless I see positive reason to the contrary.
8
See G. Bentham to M, 24 June 1862, and M to G Bentham 26 August 1862 (in this edition as 62-08-26a). Bentham (1863-78), vol. 1, pp. 104-5 recognized only one species, reducing the Tasmanian form to a subspecies, citing M's assurance that 'in cultivation it passes into the normal form'.
Ever yours truly
George Bentham
I have been hunting up Turczaninow's wretched determinations and have some necessary changes to make in the names of a few of Drummond's
Pittosporeae

Search for Pittosporeae in

& some others in which he has the priority.
Commersonia pulchella

Search for Commersonia pulchella in

& crispa which he afterwards put into Rulingia are true Commersonias near Gaudichaudi but different in staminodia as well as in foliage — they are not amongst yours.