Document information

Physical location:

RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1858-70, ff. 62-7. 62.07.24a

Plant names

Preferred Citation:

Ferdinand von Mueller to George Bentham, 1862-07-24 [62.07.24a]. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/62-07-24a>, accessed April 5, 2025

1
MS black-edged; M's sister Bertha died on 7 September 1861. The addressee is deduced from the reference to Bentham & Hooker (1862-83). Some pages of the MS are numbered, probably by M, but these numbers are omitted here.
Melbourne bot.Garden,
24 July 1862
My very dear Sir.
I am in possession of your very kind letters dated ,
2
There is a blank space in the MS. Topics discussed in this letter were included in G. Bentham to M, 19 May 1862, and G. Bentham to M, 24 May 1862 (see below).
and am glad to learn, that your & Dr Hookers important work on the genera plantarum
3
Bentham & Hooker (1862-83).
is so rapidly striding forward. It will for ever be a boon to the botanical world, because it may be long before any authors will be able to bring to bear on such an undertaking that amount of experience which you possess, and indeed I believe you will not leave very much to do for others here after, because the discovery of really striking new genera becomes rarer from day to day & after all except in Central Africa very few localities, holding out hopes for remarkable new generic forms, remain to be explored.
I find this fact born out by my friends or collectors, who have in their contributions now only a very small percentage of new species & seldom any very remarkable genera.
I am about to resume the publication of my "plants of Victoria" in order to have always the material worked up, as far as Victoria is concerned, before I send it to you. I cannot do otherwise, because if by an accident any sendings on these long sea-voyages were lost, what should I do for my flora of Victoria, for which the material is nowhere else exstant and which to collect again would require many years travels, for which I have now no leisure and perhaps not sufficient bodily strenght But as your genera plantarum will cost you much time I anticipate you will leave me sufficient time always [as] to proceed with care & circumspection in the elaboration of the Victorian plants. It would be a pity, if I was required to hurry over the work. When once the
Calyciflorae

Search for Calyciflorae in

are done, we will have comparatively easy work, relying on the completer latter volumes of D.C.
4
A. P. de Candolle (1823-73).
& on RBr. prodromus
5
R. Brown (1810).
as safe foundations of our own labours. — I propose to divide the Victorian
Calyciflorae

Search for Calyciflorae in

into 3 small volumes.
6
The planned volumes were never published.
One of these will contain the following orders:
Portulaceae

Search for Portulaceae in

,
Ficoideae

Search for Ficoideae in

,
Crassulaceae

Search for Crassulaceae in

,
Saxifrageae

Search for Saxifrageae in

,
Lythraceae

Search for Lythraceae in

Onagreae

Search for Onagreae in

,
Halorageae

Search for Halorageae in

,
Ceratophylleae

Search for Ceratophylleae in

,
Callitrichineae

Search for Callitrichineae in

,
Euphorbiaceae

Search for Euphorbiaceae in

,
Stackhousiaceae

Search for Stackhousiaceae in

,
Celastrineae

Search for Celastrineae in

,
Rhamneae

Search for Rhamneae in

,
Rosaceae

Search for Rosaceae in

&
Myrtaceae

Search for Myrtaceae in

; this will be the sequence & these orders will comprise approximately 160 sp.
An other volume will be devoted exclusively to
Leguminosae

Search for Leguminosae in

, comprising also about 160 sp This will form a transit from the free-petalled orders to the mostly gamopetalous ones of a third volume, which will comprise:
Umbelliferae

Search for Umbelliferae in

,
Araliaceae

Search for Araliaceae in

,
Lorantheae

Search for Lorantheae in

,
Caprifoliaceae

Search for Caprifoliaceae in

and
Compositae

Search for Compositae in

. This will be a large volume especially rich in genera, the
Compositae

Search for Compositae in

of Victoria even after a rigid & careful reduction will hardly fall short of 200 sp. & the other orders comprising also not less than 60 sp. I do really not know, where to place best our
Cucurbitaceae

Search for Cucurbitaceae in

&
Passifloreae

Search for Passifloreae in

, especially the former with their truly monopetalous flowers & should be inclined to arrange them with
Corolliflorae

Search for Corolliflorae in

(also on account of their definite stamens,) were not such an evident concrescence existing of Corolla & Calyx.
But perhaps your genera will be edited in time to shed light on my path. Pray keep well up the genera! it is an infinitely more important work than the Flora Australis.
I regret to learn, that you found larvae in the Gov. Herbarium,
7
See G. Bentham to M, 19 May 1862.
notwithstanding the great pains I took in cleaning it & keeping it well. Here where insect life is so active throughout the year, it will always be difficult to conserve the herbaria well, & I shall probably dip finally each specimen in a basin with oil of turpentine hereafter. I regard this a better means of protection, than arsenical or hydrargyrical
8
i.e. solutions of salts of mercury.
solutions, because it covers the plant forever with a slight resinous tegument, formed by the oxydation of the oil, irrespective of the advantage, that such collections are not exhaling vapours highly injurious to health! Insects certainly do not like to bury their ova in substances saturated with turpentine, & by addition of spirits of tar, creosote, petroleum, kerosene or any other preservative oily substance, the impregnation of the specimens may be made still more perfect. I have written at length on the subject, as Treviranus has made it the subject of a lecture
9
Treviranus (1861), a lecture presented on 8 October 1861.
& Lenormand writes to me also on the effect of his sulfurretted Carbon for the same purpose.
10
Letter not found.
I believe you would find my method good at Kew. By having two shallow vessels, the one may serve for dipping, the other might be placed slightly on a decline, so that from a wire netting the superabundance of the oil of turpentine may flow off & back to the dipping vessel. It requires of course pressure of the specimens in blotting paper afterwards, so that they may not soil the cartridge paper of the herbarium. Their colour does not suffer I have forwarded to you on the 3 of this month 2 large boxes pr "Kent" They contain the rest of the
Thalamiflorae

Search for Thalamiflorae in

except
Sapindaceae

Search for Sapindaceae in

&
Portulaceae

Search for Portulaceae in

.
11
See M to W. Hooker, 4 July 1862.
It was my intention to have kept back the
Sapindaceae

Search for Sapindaceae in

, until I would enjoy the advantage of consulting your genera. But I rather send them off at once, in order that no delay may occur, as you can readily transfer them to their respective genera from the diagnoses furnished. Be so kind to quote no synonyms even if printed in any of my catalogues, unless established by a printed diagnosis . It withdraws from the dignity of the work to enumerate such ephemerous quotations, the systematic being indeed already burdened enough with multiplications of names.
12
See Lucas (1995).
I hope that your next letters will announce the safe arrival of the
Rutaceae

Search for Rutaceae in

! It is perhaps the gem of my collections, consisting of a magnificent series of forms of these lovely plants. I tremble for their safety, as I have entrusted them to a private channel (altho an excellent one), they being sent without bill of loading under care of the Surgeon of the " Dovre
13
Dover?
Castle " Dr Thomson. I wrote however simultaneously to Sir Will Hooker of Kew, announcing their shipment under the above circumstances.
14
M reiterated the point in numerous letters: see M to W. Hooker, 24 April 1862 (in this edition as 62-04-24f) and M to W. Hooker, 24 June 1862 (in this edition as 62-06-24c); M to J. Hooker, 22 June 1862; M to G. Bentham, 23 May 1862.
The addition of a n.g. of
Menispermeae

Search for Menispermeae in

to the Austr. flora through my collections has pleased me much! I certainly did only look at it without entering into an analysis, thus I passed it as
Pachygone

Search for Pachygone in

.
15
See G. Bentham to M, 24 May 1862, where Bentham reported erecting the genus Microclisia (Bentham & Hooker (1862-83), vol. 1, p. 435). Bentham retained the plant within
Pachygone

Search for Pachygone in

in Bentham (1863-78), vol.1, p. 58, without citing his earlier genus in synonymy, although indicating his uncertainty by listing the species as 'P. (?) pubescens'.
In the consignment sent pr "Kent" you receive all the addenda up to date for
Thalamiflorae

Search for Thalamiflorae in

. I will keep up Supplemental notes as far as possible from any new material, that may come in. I regret to say, that I have not as yet had time to extract the localities from my diaries, whereby the habitats would have been much augmented. I felt that I had to interrupt my literary work for a while & to confine my attention to the correspondence of this very large Department and its many harrassing duties at this season of the year, when we have to provide plants for the gardens & reserves of public institutions throughout the colony & when so much new work is under progress. Had I done more, my health would have given way entirely. I have however as you will see advanced the fragmenta to the 19 Number.
16
B62.07.01.
I have also drawn up an enumeration of the plants collected in Stuarts 2 last expeditions and on those of Fr Gregory from N.W. Australia. I shall probably send them to Balfour.
17
cf. M to W. Hooker, 24 May 1862 (in this edition as 62-05-24b). See B63.04.03.
I have also begun to publish or rather print the large folio-plates of the Eucalypti for my monograph.
18
The plates were not published at this time.
They may therefore be quoted in the Flora already. I have in vain endeavoured to bring the australian
Sapindaceae

Search for Sapindaceae in

allied to
Cupania

Search for Cupania in

&
Nephelium

Search for Nephelium in

into the more recent genera. The limits of all the genera of Blume seem to me artificial. But without examining the Extra Australian
Sapindaceae

Search for Sapindaceae in

extensively no one can arrive at satisfactory conclusions in regard to the generic distinctions of these plants The 5 species, of which I forwarded manuscript names are nowhere published as yet by myself,
19
Manuscripts containing the names have not been found. Bentham named nine species of Sapindaceous genera using M's herbarium names; see Bentham (1863-78), vol. 1, pp. 451-88.
and you will observe the descriptions are drawn up from incomplete material. The material of the various
Sapindaceae

Search for Sapindaceae in

described in my publications has in general been good and I believe you will be pleased with the collection, especially as it represents so many noble trees.
The arillus is subject to much variation. In the two
Harpulia

Search for Harpulia in

e for instance it is small & scutellar in one & large & perfectly enveloping the seed in an other. I anticipate that you will have restored
Nephelium

Search for Nephelium in

&
Cupania

Search for Cupania in

with large subgenera & into these most of my plants will go then.
Of Euodia I have 6 species E. pentacocca, neurococca, micrococca, erythrococca, Cunninghami, octandra. The aestivation whether valvate or intricate will not distinguish these genera, nor the number of stamens, which varies from 4-10 in the genus, altho' it is constant in the species, or nearly so.
Acradenia

Search for Acradenia in

I draw also to Euodia.
To Dr Hookers list of Indo Australian plants
20
J. Hooker (1860), 'Introductory essay', pp. xlii-xlix, also published separately as J. Hooker (1859a).
very many have yet to be added. So I find we have
Crotalaria ramosissima

Search for Crotalaria ramosissima in

&
Cassia pumila

Search for Cassia pumila in

. The Crotalariae have even in W. & A.
21
Wight & Arnott (1834).
yet to be much reduced. It is much to be regretted I had not their golden prodromus with me in N. Australia, as it would have facilitated the study of the Indo-Australian species. That the sum of £100 - "- " for your Flora is available at the Colonial Agent of Victoria in London for you, you will have learnt from my letter by last mail.
22
See M to G. Bentham, 24 June 1862 (in this edition as 62-06-24b).
The Hibisci are extremely variable! There is little to separate H. multifidus & Pinonianus except perhaps the stigma.
Fugosia

Search for Fugosia in

as a genus is of course quite untenable.
23
Bentham discussed these points at length in G. Bentham to M, 8 October 1862.
You will kindly observe that I have altered the names of the
Seringea

Search for Seringea in

s. I leave only the old typical species in the genus & draw the rest to
Kerandrenia

Search for Kerandrenia in

, which mainly differs in habit, & requires great alteration in definition.
That
Pentadynamis

Search for Pentadynamis in

is a true Crotalaria you will have observe[d.] Strange that the dimorphous state of the anthers of all typical Crotalariae remained so long overlooked.
I have forwarded for your aid some citata index to Sir Will Hooker.
24
See M to W. Hooker, 25 July 1861 (in this edition as 61-07-25a) for reference to B59.13.03; an index to the first two volumes of Fragmenta was published in B61.11.04, but no mention of separate copies of these indexes having been forwarded to W. Hooker has been found.
Mount Lapeyrouse is in Tasmania. Sealers cove on the peninsula of Wilsons promontory
25
See G. Bentham to M, 24 May 1862.
Is the genus
Allophyllus

Search for Allophyllus in

to be reestablished? If so we have, it seems, Australian species.
I should have many things yet to communicate, were I not transgressing both your & my leisure
Ever regardfully
your
Ferd Mueller