Document information
Physical location:
Natural History Museum, London, Museum Archives, DF3/1/folder 42, Cranbourne, Australia 1861-1936. 62.02.20Preferred Citation:
Ferdinand von Mueller to Nevil Maskelyne, 1862-02-20. R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells (eds), Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, <https://vmcp.rbg.vic.gov.au/id/62-02-20>, accessed April 29, 2025
1
MS black-edged; M's sister Bertha died on 7 September 1861.
Garden, 20 febr. 62
My dear Prof. Maskelyne,
I beg to lay before you a brief statement of our position in regard to your acquisition
of the Great Cranbourne Meteor for the British Museum.
The present owner, Mr James Bruce of Sherbourne Park had originally the intention
to present the whole specimen to your noble institute, but on Mr Abels transmission
of his meteor from the same locality to London, Mr Bruce declared himself ready to
divide the great meteor between the British & Melbourne museum[s] when Prof. Mc Coy
expressed a desire to secure the specimen for our museum. I was not aware of this
arrangement until after having received permission from Mr Bruce to remove the meteor
with a view of sending it to the British museum, whilst meanwhile Prof. McCoy accepted
the offer of half of the specimen made by Mr Bruce. Writing to Prof McCoy, as you
will perceive by the enclosed copy, I pointed out the indesirability of such a course,
when my friend agreed that if the Abelian Meteor could be secured by you and returned
to the Melbourne Museum, he would forego his partial claims on the larger specimen.
This proposition is also regarded in a favorable light by his Excellency the Governor,
who with most praise worthy interest desired to secure the main meteoric mass for
your Museum and offered to make the necessary pre-payments for the removal.
2
See Lucas et al. (1994).
3
See M to F. McCoy, 14 February 1862, and F. McCoy to M, 17 February 1862.
Mr Selwyn has kindly offered to give every assistance, which his geological Department
can aford in facilitating the removal and the same will be done by me, so that I think
the cost of the removal will be trifling to your institute or probably none, because
if our Museum receives back the Abelian Meteor, it would perhaps be possible to charge
the transport of the larger mass here to the museum fund. Since Mr Abel of Ballarat
instructed his nephew, Prof Abel of Woolwich, to act for him in the disposal of his
specimen, I think the latter Gentleman, will see the propriety of reducing the price
in proportion to the overestimated weight, the former having been fixed at £300 "-"- and the weight having proved to be not as anticipated 3000 lb but only about 2300 lb.
The weight of the great Meteor is estimated at 8000 lb, altho only approximately so,
the specimen not being yet fully disinterred.
Ready to do everything in my power for the accomplishment of your wishes,
I remain
my very dear Sir, regardfully
yours Ferd. Mueller