Kew June 22d/58
Dear Dr. Mueller
I am very much obliged for your letters,
& glad to hear of all your doings & that the gardens at Melbourne progress so well.
I do not know whether my Father has written to you about the books he ordered for
you — & the money which he has in hand; lest he should not have done so I may say
that 1) The Flora Indica is out of print; & has been long ago. The Introductory Essay
alone remains on sale. The E.I.C.
having refused to patronize the work or take copies when proposed to them to subscribe
Dr T.
& I published the Fl. Indica wholly at our own cost; & printed only 250 copies —
we gave away 100 of these & put a merely nominal price of 16/ on the rest. When the
E.I.C. saw this they forthwith bought up 100 copies, which threw the work out of print,
prevented its circulation amongst Botanists, & defeated our object altogether — The
whole affair cost us upwards of £200
dead loss
. We printed 250 extra copies of the Introd. Essay, which alone remain on sale. Had
I a duplicate copy I would send it you with pleasure.
With regard to the "Species Filicum"
you have all the numbers that have been published — As to the missing numbers of
Icones Plantarum
my Father intended to have given them to you himself, & neglected to do so as it
appears. With regard to some other books you want we will get them if we can, but
these things are not to be had for the ordering at any time; & these scientific Booksellers
are perfect plagues — My Father has ordered for you a new work on Ferns,
of which he has no presentation copies, & Harveys Phycologia Australica
— of which two numbers came at once for you — he has still a good deal of money of
yours in hand & we are on the look out for a copy of the Bot. Mag:
&c for you.
Would you not like to join the Linnaean Society? you ought to be an F.L.S. & if so
inclined we will manage it for you.
The Entrance fee is £6 I think & the annual payment but I think one payment of £30
clears you of all future subscriptions. The publication which are given gratis to
fellows are worth this money.
I have sent to L.S. in your name your papers in
s & Eucalypti
Mr Bentham very kindly revised the former, & you will be surprized to hear that it
took him upwards of a week's hard work; — working as you do, you have evidently no
idea of the time & care it takes to turn out satisfactory Botanical works comparing
specimens, & descriptions & confirming synonymy & references with proper care is much
slower work than you are aware of. — We think no errors trivial or venial that can
be avoided with proper care & proper materials. You have no conception of the amount
of trouble & time it takes to correct an error of identification The slap-dash style
of publication has brought the science into terrible confusion already.
The whole of your extensive & splendid collections are now put away, in the general
Herbarium — they are truly wonderful, & the knowledge you have displayed in naming
& arranging them is very great. In putting them away Mr Black
& I found of course a good many synonyms &c &c, & of some these my Father sent you
a list the other day.
I did all your grasses myself — they are
extremely
difficult, & a very great many are known Indian species, of Roxburgh & Nees, but
of which the Indian specimens are not satisfactorily identified in any Herbarium.
I have now just begun to work out my Indian Grasses of which I have upwards of 100
huge bundles — they when done will enable me to name yours more satisfactorily before
many months are over.
I am in some doubt about your copy of "Flora Tasmaniae".
I sent you some numbers (uncolored, I have no colored copies allowed me) a year &
a half ago — (2 I think) & I cannot make out from your letters whether you have received
them — on the other hand I gather from your letters that you have, or have access
to a copy. Under these circumstances I have refrained from continuing the copy I sent,
lest the first-numbers should have been lost. — Will you therefore tell me how this
matter stands. If you have received
none
, & care to have it, I will send you a complete copy.
With regard to proof sheets, they are so full of errors & corrections that I cannot
trust them out of my own possession. Errors thus multiplied from proofsheets lead
to irremediable confusion &
can never be traced to their origin
.
My Father & I drew up a report
on your whole Botanical career in Australia for the Colonial office, but we have
had no copies sent us of it nor seen it in print. Your own Report to Govt was sent
to Linnaean Society, but the Col. Office would not pay for the printing of it, which
was very shabby to a private Scientific Society — the Society have however printed
it in its journal
& it will be published immediately — your paper on
& Eucalypti are also ordered for printing.
I am extremely obliged to you for your numerous & valuable corrections to my faulty
Flora Tasmanica. You will doubtless reduce my species very much, & no one will be
more glad than I am to have this done for me.
Risdoni
is not I think a small state of another — it covers one valley near Hobarton with
small trees about 10 feet high & occurs in a similar way in other parts of the Island.
Your
is certainly a
Claoxylon
very near C. muricatus Wt Flora
— Another of your Nov. Gen. is the old
. I forget the genus it is now referred to. A good many Australian tropical
appear to me to be slightly altered forms of Indian ones, but it will take years
of study to clear these points up.
You will no doubt have heard of Brown's death,
it was very peaceful & tranquil. He has left all his books & plants to Mr Bennett
except the Fossil plants which are left to Brit: Mus:
—
Believe me ever
humbly yours
Jos D Hooker
